1984 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,078 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (141 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. (133 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Eldorado.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. (270 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Cadillac Eldorado.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Cadillac Eldorado | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | Eldorado | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4078 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2380 mm |
