1984 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 2003 Mazda 6

To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,078 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. (133 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 340 kg more than 2003 Mazda 6.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Cadillac Eldorado (270 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (181 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1984 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Cadillac Eldorado 2003 Mazda 6
Make Cadillac Mazda
Model Eldorado 6
Year Released 1984 2003
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4078 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 270 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1690 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 5190 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2610 mm