1984 Cadillac Seville vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1984 Cadillac Seville is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,080 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Seville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Seville (133 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Seville should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Cadillac Seville (270 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1984 Cadillac Seville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Seville | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Seville | 66 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4080 cc | 1287 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |