1984 Cadillac Seville vs. 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Seville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Seville would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Seville weights approximately 590 kg more than 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Because 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Seville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Cadillac Seville | 2011 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Seville | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1984 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2550 mm |