1984 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3
To start off, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 2,471 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Blazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Chevrolet Blazer (91 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. (74 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Blazer should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 weights approximately 216 kg more than 1984 Chevrolet Blazer.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler ESX 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 (332 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chevrolet Blazer. (182 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chevrolet Blazer | 2000 Chrysler ESX 3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Blazer | ESX 3 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2471 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 332 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1404 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3000 mm |