1984 Chevrolet Blazer vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Blazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Blazer would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 180 more horse power than 1984 Chevrolet Blazer. (91 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1984 Chevrolet Blazer.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Blazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Blazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 418 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chevrolet Blazer. (182 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chevrolet Blazer.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chevrolet Blazer | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | Blazer | XF |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2471 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 91 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2908 mm |
