1984 Chevrolet Celebrity vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1984 Chevrolet Celebrity is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chevrolet Celebrity weights approximately 90 kg more than 1965 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1965 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Celebrity, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chevrolet Celebrity | 1965 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Celebrity | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2471 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2780 mm |
