1984 Chevrolet Citation II vs. 2001 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2001 Holden Maloo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Citation II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Citation II would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden Maloo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden Maloo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden Maloo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Citation II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden Maloo has manual transmission. 2001 Holden Maloo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Chevrolet Citation II will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chevrolet Citation II | 2001 Holden Maloo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Citation II | Maloo |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
