1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 240 kg more than 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Monte Carlo | Aurora |
Year Released | 1984 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2900 mm |