1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 289 kg more than 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1769 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2900 mm |
