1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2002 Ford Puma
To start off, 2002 Ford Puma is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 445 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2002 Ford Puma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Puma |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2450 mm |
