1984 Chevrolet Sprint vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Sprint. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Sprint would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 310 more horse power than 1984 Chevrolet Sprint. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1984 Chevrolet Sprint.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Sprint, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 453 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chevrolet Sprint. (77 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chevrolet Sprint.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chevrolet Sprint | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Sprint | UTE |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 991 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 77 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |