1984 Chrysler Executive vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Executive. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Executive would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Executive is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1984 Chrysler Executive. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1984 Chrysler Executive. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Executive weights approximately 209 kg more than 2002 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Ka (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chrysler Executive. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chrysler Executive.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Executive | 2002 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Executive | Ka |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2450 mm |
