1984 Chrysler Executive vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Executive. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Executive would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Executive is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (137 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1984 Chrysler Executive. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1984 Chrysler Executive. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Executive weights approximately 95 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (195 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chrysler Executive. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chrysler Executive.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Executive | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Executive | Clio |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5250 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2580 mm |