1984 Chrysler Laser vs. 1982 Volvo 260

To start off, 1984 Chrysler Laser is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,849 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 260 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1984 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1984 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Volvo 260 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1982 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 260 (230 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chrysler Laser.

Compare all specifications: