1984 Chrysler Laser vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (108 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1984 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1984 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 75 kg more than 1996 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (137 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1984 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Laser | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Laser | 200 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |