1984 Chrysler Laser vs. 2009 Lada 110
To start off, 2009 Lada 110 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Chrysler Laser (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Lada 110. (91 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Laser should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Laser weights approximately 25 kg more than 2009 Lada 110. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Chrysler Laser (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 110. (128 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1984 Chrysler Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 110.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Laser | 2009 Lada 110 | |
Make | Chrysler | Lada |
Model | Laser | 110 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2500 mm |