1984 Chrysler Laser vs. 2009 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2009 Toyota Tundra is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1984 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1984 Chrysler Laser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 192 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Laser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Chrysler Laser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Laser | 2009 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Laser | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 381 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 162 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1332 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3710 mm |
