1984 Chrysler Laser vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Laser would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1984 Chrysler Laser. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1984 Chrysler Laser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Chrysler Laser. (162 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Chrysler Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Laser | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Laser | Matrix |
Year Released | 1984 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2601 mm |