1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1951 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Le Baron | 220 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 78 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2850 mm |
