1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1952 Triumph TR2
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph TR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph TR2 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 335 kg more than 1952 Triumph TR2.
Because 1952 Triumph TR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Triumph TR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1952 Triumph TR2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | Le Baron | TR2 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1952 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 90 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2250 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 56 L |
