1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1953 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 2,267 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Sunbeam Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Sunbeam Alpine weights approximately 90 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1953 Sunbeam Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Sunbeam Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1953 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | Chrysler | Sunbeam |
| Model | Le Baron | Alpine |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2267 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 79 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2490 mm |
