1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1961 Dodge Polara
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,907 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Dodge Polara weights approximately 345 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1961 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1961 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | Le Baron | Polara |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 5907 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 301 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2960 mm |
