1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 40 kg more than 1965 Sunbeam Tiger.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Chrysler | Sunbeam |
Model | Le Baron | Tiger |
Year Released | 1984 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2190 mm |