1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 360 kg more than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Because 1968 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Le Baron | Elan |
Year Released | 1984 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2440 mm |