1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 240 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1984 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2210 mm |