1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1969 Holden Belmont
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,034 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Belmont weights approximately 95 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1969 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1969 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Le Baron | Belmont |
Year Released | 1984 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3034 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2830 mm |