1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1983 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 120 kg more than 1983 Mazda RX-7.
Because 1983 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | RX-7 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2430 mm |
