1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 118 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Artic |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3200 mm |