1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 338 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Falcon |
Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2800 mm |