1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 870 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Le Baron | SLK |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 194 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2430 mm |
