1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 150 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Because 2003 Mazda Roadster is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mazda Roadster. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | Roadster |
Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2270 mm |