1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 440 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | Le Baron | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1810 mm |
