1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 51 kg more than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1311 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |
