1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Le Baron | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2960 mm |