1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 855 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2009 Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | Le Baron | Crossfire |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 215 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
