1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2009 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Challenger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | 2009 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | Le Baron | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3518 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2950 mm |
