1984 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2011 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2011 Jaguar XJ is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 694 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.

Because 2011 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1984 Chrysler Le Baron 2011 Jaguar XJ
Make Chrysler Jaguar
Model Le Baron XJ
Year Released 1984 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2212 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 385 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 1874 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 5248 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1895 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 3157 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]