1984 Citroen Axel vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1984 Citroen Axel is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1984 Citroen Axel. (60 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen Axel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 295 kg more than 1984 Citroen Axel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen Axel. (98 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen Axel.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen Axel | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | Axel | 2000 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65.6 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2700 mm |