1984 Citroen Axel vs. 1983 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1984 Citroen Axel is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Citroen Axel (60 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1983 Ford Tempo. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Citroen Axel should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Ford Tempo weights approximately 235 kg more than 1984 Citroen Axel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Ford Tempo (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen Axel. (98 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1983 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen Axel.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen Axel | 1983 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Axel | Tempo |
Year Released | 1984 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2540 mm |