1984 Citroen Axel vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen Axel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen Axel would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1984 Citroen Axel. (60 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen Axel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1984 Citroen Axel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (271 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen Axel. (98 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen Axel.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen Axel | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Axel | 6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2680 mm |