1984 Citroen BX vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1984 Citroen BX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Citroen BX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Citroen BX (61 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Citroen BX should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Citroen BX weights approximately 120 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Citroen BX (109 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Citroen BX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen BX | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | BX | 102 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 61 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 109 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2160 mm |