1984 Citroen BX vs. 1999 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 1999 Jaguar XJ is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen BX would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Jaguar XJ (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1984 Citroen BX. (61 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 820 kg more than 1984 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen BX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jaguar XJ (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 284 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen BX. (109 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen BX. 1999 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1984 Citroen BX has manual transmission. 1984 Citroen BX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Citroen BX | 1999 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | BX | XJ |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 3996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 109 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 86 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 87 L |
