1984 Citroen BX vs. 1999 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen BX would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Citroen BX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1984 Citroen BX. (61 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda Midge weights approximately 76 kg more than 1984 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Citroen BX (109 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1984 Citroen BX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Citroen BX | 1999 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | BX | Midge |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 61 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 109 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
