1984 Citroen C 15 vs. 2000 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2000 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Citroen C 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 ZAZ Wagon (51 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1984 Citroen C 15. (47 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 ZAZ Wagon should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2000 ZAZ Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Citroen C 15 (86 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 ZAZ Wagon. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1984 Citroen C 15 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 ZAZ Wagon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Citroen C 15 | 2000 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Citroen | ZAZ |
| Model | C 15 | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1984 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 86 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 67 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2330 mm |
