1984 Citroen C 15 vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1984 Citroen C 15. (47 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen C 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen C 15. (86 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen C 15 | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | C 15 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1984 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 86 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |