1984 Citroen CX vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1984 Citroen CX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Citroen CX (168 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Citroen CX weights approximately 199 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1984 Citroen CX | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | CX | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1984 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1409 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2540 mm |
