1984 Citroen CX vs. 1990 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 (200 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1984 Citroen CX. (168 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen CX.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Citroen CX (301 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Jaguar XJ6. (299 Nm). This means 1984 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen CX | 1990 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | CX | XJ6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 301 Nm | 299 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 83 mm |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 217 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2880 mm |