1984 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Fiat Palio II
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Citroen CX (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1984 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 558 kg more than 1984 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Citroen CX (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1984 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen CX | 2006 Fiat Palio II | |
Make | Citroen | Fiat |
Model | CX | Palio II |
Year Released | 1984 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1697 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 20.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1783 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 47 L |