1984 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (147 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1984 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1984 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1984 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (186 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1984 Citroen CX | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 6 |
Year Released | 1984 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 147 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 64 L |